Guild icon
Tulpa.info
Tulpa Discussion / tulpa-discussion
The channel for discussion strictly on the topic of tulpas. Take off-topic discussion to #lounge Forum's Tulpa Discussion Board: https://community.tulpa.info/forum/4-general-discussion/
Avatar
But I'd say both of those are things you should be avoiding
6:27 PM
Don't imagine your tulpa do stuff. Have your tulpa imagine themselves doing stuff.
6:27 PM
Or, even better, have them do stuff.
Avatar
Deleted User 8/29/2018 6:30 PM
Ehh
6:30 PM
You know, at the beginning they are not really independent agents
6:31 PM
Is it important if you set them up or let your unconscoious imagination do it for you?
Avatar
<Ponytail> even now I still puppet them in a sense, now that Mon mentions it. Like picking them up in wonderland, it's not like we individually come up with the movements of our own forms while we do that. So, sometimes when I do things like that, the mental image gets interrupted with her punching me in the gut instead.
6:52 PM
<Ponytail> my tulpas are violent
Avatar
Yeah, a lot of the stuff that happens in our headspace is kinda... shared?
7:01 PM
I wouldn't necessarily call it puppeting. It's just not being done by either of us, really?
Avatar
Moonlit_Menagerie 8/29/2018 11:11 PM
You can run multiple POVs without pushing someone into an NPC position? o.o
Avatar
@Deleted User "Very young tulpas are more like imaginary friends than alternate identities."
1:02 AM
so how do we make the transition from that imaginary friend stage with vocality and independant movement to alternate identiy?
1:02 AM
what is considered young?
1:04 AM
about the parrotanoia that was just what I needed to hear, I often forget that I can't logically prove anything and I know the answers weren't directed towards me but I got to thank you guys for sharing them because they help the people lurking and who are confused. (edited)
1:05 AM
I just feel like that alien feeling has diminished, like she used to consistently surprise me and now it's just like you know, not bad, but not as surprising, like that feeling of "this is NOT me" has gone away but I guess that happens with familiarity and time with anyone
1:05 AM
I tend to over think things. This is a really helpful channel with loads of great people who help.
1:07 AM
I do have a question though, so she has never had like a monologue, where she talks for extended periods without any input from me. Its sentences at best so far but no paragraphs from her, and I find that as she speaks I fill in the blanks without thinking and that bothers me. Any advice on that?
Avatar
Deleted User 8/30/2018 1:13 AM
[i guess it kinda just comes with time, and as they develop more interests/connections of their own independent of you]
1:13 AM
[least that was the case with clara]
Avatar
Breloomancer 8/30/2018 2:38 AM
I experienced a similar problem, my tulpa was vocal, but would respond to questions in a pretty boring manor, and would rarly come up with topics of discussion on her own. It seemed to me like she had recessed from being well developed, to being quite basic. That period has now passed and she is more talkative, and offers more interesting points, than ever before. My only advice is to not get discouraged and keep forcing as regularly as you can
Avatar
Moonlit_Menagerie 8/30/2018 3:30 AM
Thank you
3:30 AM
I am having a similar issue
Avatar
I remember those times too. It still happens to me sometimes. (edited)
11:11 AM
Where I just kind of... run out of ideas?
11:11 AM
Often coupled with not being present as much as normal, or doing fewer things myself.
11:12 AM
I cherish days like today where I get to front, and talk to my friends online and actually do things. Sorta gives me the energy to "be a person" for a little while longer.
Avatar
I think there might be a deeper issue to clarify: What does it mean to have "no input from me"? I mean, for me, it is pretty clear there's only one line of consciousness with very little evidence supporting the idea that there's multiple, so there's this central consciousness through which thoughts are created and filtered by the perspective of whatever "identity" may be responsible for it.
Avatar
Hello im new I tried signing up for the forum but it keeps saying my security question is wrong ?
12:19 PM
I have some questions maybe I can ask them here ?
Avatar
@Jas I've noticed a divide - some systems have pretty early multiple lines of consciousness, while others don't.
12:24 PM
We only have one, but we're trying really hard to figure out how to get multiple.
12:24 PM
@DogMilk Sure, ask away.
Avatar
The distinction there, I believe, is plurality vs tulpamancy.
Avatar
What? no.
12:25 PM
Tulpamancy is a subset of plurality.
12:25 PM
I'm referring specifically to tulpamancy systems here, btw.
12:26 PM
Although most other types of plurality seem to be predominantly multi-consciousness
Avatar
I like to think of tulpamancy as significantly distinct from plurality at large.
Avatar
Well, I disagree.
Avatar
With that meaning that tulpamancy is not "plurality but you tried to make it happen".
Avatar
From talking to loads and loads of systems of various types, they seem like the same core concept, but of course with surface level variations.
Avatar
The evidence I have seen for parallel consciousnesses in the same brain has so far been so little that I would sooner assume it be impossible. If you have any reason to believe otherwise, I'd love to learn why.
Avatar
Well, it's not something you can prove.
12:28 PM
Only learn more about through anecdotal evidence.
12:28 PM
And I've heard people describe both types.
Avatar
Pardon? There are several tests that can show parallelism rather easily.
Avatar
Like what?
Avatar
It is something you can look to evidence on. Consciousness isn't something you can test, but cards said it better than I could there.
Avatar
I only arrived at my current place by conducting such tests, by trying to enact productive thoughts on my own while my host was occupied.
Avatar
There have been tests done among people attempting to count balls on one half of the screen while their tulpa counted the other
12:30 PM
it wasn't the most scientific, but the results were nonetheless such that tulpamancers were not more successful at it
Avatar
Mathematics is the easiest way to verify objective parallel consciousness, otherwise I would not be comfortable calling whatever it is a "consciousness" if it is permanently tethered to a central strand of attention and processing
Avatar
It was done by a member of the community here, as well. There are accounts of mathematics being done "in the background", but if you look to how the actual problems of math are solved, more often the "in the background" was actually that the person leaving the problem and coming back left them with a fresh frame of reference which allowed the solution to "click"
12:31 PM
this is account for as "oh, I solved it in my head", but there isn't much evidence of that being the case.
Avatar
I don't really believe in parallel processing
Avatar
The ball test can be worked around with a trick. My host counted in english and I counted in mandarin, our results were better but not necessarily conclusive for the purpose of the test.
Avatar
Instead I'm referring to how there are multiple parallel trains of thought and points of observation
12:32 PM
Not necessarily concurrent
12:32 PM
Just parallel
Avatar
I have parallel trains of thought all the time.
Avatar
Would you say you can experience things yourself?
Avatar
For example, I am thinking of getting up and turning off the fan in my bathroom as I speak here
Avatar
I see, if that is what you mean then we aren't at odds at all, it seems normal to have multiple angles of view.
Avatar
Or does your entire system experience things together
Avatar
I was just confused because consciousness has a particular sort of sense to me that implies something rather strong, I wanted to make sure it was clear.
Avatar
I don't mean "having a tulpa can make you do math twice as fast because you do two problems at a time" type stuff.
Avatar
It takes time for character to build to the level that the output of one's thoughts can be assessed as a different person entirely. There's a lot of things, small and big, that come together in making someone. Not to mention the amount required to make a functional someone.
Avatar
I haven't observed that even in the most hardcore DID systems
Avatar
Could you maybe explain what a hardcore did system is?
Avatar
Perhaps this is a better question: when you're in the back, not fronting, what are you doing?
Avatar
Like, what sets them apart?
Avatar
Like someone with severe trauma, splits, dissociation, etc
Avatar
Anything that "happens" when not occupying conscious thought is deemed nonexistent and a confabulation.
Avatar
The trouble is that when someone says their tulpa is "in the back and doing things" while they are also going about their day, if they recount that their tulpa was doing something, they are likely recounting what amounts to a false or constructed memory.
12:36 PM
unless they are doing something like regularly "checking in"
Avatar
@Jas I said "not fronting", not "not conscious"
Avatar
Since that decision, I go dormant when my host is in front unless I am watching over his shoulder or he mine.
Avatar
And I'm asking you about your personal experiences with not fronting
Avatar
"fronting" implies a dominance over conscious thought, but there are degrees to such a thing.
Avatar
Yeah, sounds like descriptions I get from single consciousness systems
12:38 PM
Multiconsciousness systems would say something like "I'm in the back, observing but not doing or thinking much", often describing feeling numb or hazy
12:38 PM
Whereas I would just... not exist.
Avatar
Hm, I think it depends on what time we're talking about. I used to not front, make my own memories either in reality or in wonderland, before learning that the only memories carrying any objective weight were ones where I was allowed to be dominant over some objective line of attention.
Avatar
Or even describing being immersed in wonderland, but I consider that a more developed version of the latter description
Avatar
In my opinion tulpas who still quietly observe are just the ones with a lot of practice fronting
12:39 PM
I go inactive if I don't front, Apollo observes
Avatar
I'm a tulpa, I'm fronting right now. Probably spent around 2 weeks in front in total, combined. Whenever I'm not fronting, I don't exist, I don't observe, I don't think
Avatar
It takes more than two weeks
Avatar
If I get called upon I can still respond. But I'm not present.
Avatar
Since then I decided to put my chips in the real world and make myself into a functional person. Or rather, a functional part of a person. Since then has been the slow march towards 50/50 fronting and acquiring mastery over certain contexts to naturally be dominant over.
Avatar
We average an 80/20 front split so far
Avatar
Apollo has spent months fronting and he can do this at times
Avatar
Pretty good for me being under 6 months old.
Avatar
It's much easier when there's a compelling reason to allow me to be in front, if my personality type carries within it a set of tools both different and more useful than my host's in particular contexts.
12:42 PM
Now, the way it works is the person with mastery over something is in front whenever that thing is necessary, and when neither of us are needed both of us share until one of us is needed.
Avatar
@Felight How about my host? She's spent nearly 17 years in front.
12:42 PM
And she's not present or observing or thinking right now.
Avatar
....you have switching down at six months?
Avatar
Depends on how you define "down".
Exported 100 message(s)
Timezone: UTC+0
Page 1 ... Page 196 ... Page 197 ... Page 198 ... Page 999